Money in a group
In short
In the end, each person comes down to one number: what they paid minus their share. Anyone above zero gets money back, anyone below zero pays. Settled that way, a group of n people needs at most n − 1 transfers instead of everyone paying everyone. Equal splits suit trips, shares suit groups with kids, and many couples split by income.
Every shared expense has two sides: who paid and who it was for. That gives each person a balance, their standing in the group:
Anna, Ben, Clara and David split everything equally. Anna paid for the rental, Ben for dinner out and the big grocery run, Clara for gas, David for nothing.
| Person | Paid | Share | Balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna | €600 | €250 | +€350 |
| Ben | €300 | €250 | +€50 |
| Clara | €100 | €250 | −€150 |
| David | €0 | €250 | −€250 |
| Total | €1,000 | €1,000 | €0 |
If every expense were settled on its own, everyone would owe every payer their share. In the example that's nine transfers, some going both ways: Anna owes Ben her share of dinner while Ben owes Anna his share of the rental.
Working from the balances cancels out that back and forth. Whoever is below zero pays whoever is above zero until everyone is at zero:
Three transfers instead of nine, with the same result for everyone. The rule behind it: every transfer brings at least one person to zero, so n people never need more than n − 1 transfers.
The method matters less than agreeing up front. A first talk about "who drank how much" after the trip is rarely about the money.
If both earn about the same, 50/50 is simplest. If incomes are far apart, many couples split shared costs in proportion to take-home pay, so both keep a similar share of their own money.
| Example | Take-home | Share | Of €1,500 fixed costs | Left |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50/50: partner A | €3,000 | 50% | €750 | €2,250 |
| 50/50: partner B | €2,000 | 50% | €750 | €1,250 |
| By income: partner A | €3,000 | 60% | €900 | €2,100 |
| By income: partner B | €2,000 | 40% | €600 | €1,400 |
Split by income, both keep 70% of their take-home pay. Which is fair is up to the couple; there's no right or wrong. It helps to separate shared costs (rent, groceries, vacations) from personal spending (hobbies, clothes) and split only the shared ones.
In the euro area, a GiroCode (EPC QR code) is a QR code following a European Payments Council standard for SEPA transfers. It holds the name, IBAN, amount and reference. Many European banking apps read it via photo or scan transfer, which fills in the whole transfer; you only confirm it. No typing an IBAN means no typos.
For quick small amounts, PayPal links or cash are common too. What matters is marking debts as paid afterwards so nobody pays twice.
As of October 23, 2026. The examples are rounded and made up.
The matching app
Obolus works exactly like this: you log who paid and for whom, and the app shows everyone their balance and suggests as few transfers as possible. For iPhone, iPad and Android.
Work out for each person what they paid minus their share. Whoever is below zero pays whoever is above zero until everyone is at zero. That way n people need at most n − 1 transfers.
At most one fewer than the number of people, if you settle the balances rather than each expense. For four people, three at most, often fewer.
With similar incomes, 50/50 is simplest. With a big gap, many couples split in proportion to take-home pay, for example 60/40 at €3,000 and €2,000. Both are fair when agreed up front.
A QR code following the European Payments Council standard for SEPA transfers. It holds the name, IBAN, amount and reference. Many European banking apps read it via photo or scan transfer, which fills in the transfer.
Convert each expense at the rate of the day it was paid, then split it. Obolus Plus does this with the daily rate of the European Central Bank.
More from the guide